By Tony Pham, 2nd-year MS student
Nepal is a country known for its traditional healers. Exploring the intersection of traditional healers and mental well-being allows for the enhancement of preexisting mental health services rather than their replacement. From a more culturally informed perspective on reducing mental health disparities, this approach makes more sense as biomedical models of healing may not match current Nepali ethnopsychological mindsets, nor are they a familiar avenue for healing for Nepali individuals of lower socioeconomic status.
In May and June 2018, I worked with an interdisciplinary team to conduct a qualitative, directly observational and participatory pilot project that took place in the rural region of Sindhuli, Nepal, an area widely known for its shamanic healing rituals as practiced by the Tamang population.
Our study took place in a small village known as Dumja. Dumja residents are mostly farmers whose lives are characterized by poor access to electricity, clean water and irrigation. This remote, rural setting was ideal for analysis as community members in these types of areas often turn to traditional healers more frequently than their urban counterparts.
In total, we sampled 56 community members and 26 traditional healers. Participants in our study took part in semistructured, in-depth interviews that were then recorded and transcribed for qualitative analysis. Our observations and interviews centered on background stressors for seeking traditional mental healthcare, rationale for choosing traditional healers, the process of traditional healing practices and how community members and traditional healers process these practices.
The collected interview data led to a preliminary mechanisms of actions model and several initial conclusions:
- Disease etiology: Nepali mental distress may be biological, psychological and/or sociological in origin.
- Barriers to care: Given the presence of stigma, mental health illiteracy and sociological oppression, patients may redirect mental distress toward biological complaints.
- Chief complaint: Certain psychiatric and sociological complaints are more easily expressed using culturally acceptable idioms of distress.
- Pathways to care: Patients will seek help either though the biomedical or magical-religious realms depending on illness severity and the chief complaint.
- Diagnosis/Treatment: In general, patients who present biological or psychiatric complaints present to either the biomedical realm (evidence-based medicine) or magical-religious realm (common therapeutic factors/symbolic healing). On the other hand, patients who present their mental distress using idioms of distress generally present to the magical-religious realm.
- Outcome: If the patient experiences partial resolution they may seek a secondary opinion from another medical provider or a traditional healer until they experience complete resolution.
In 2019, we are planning to transition to a more expanded network of healing sites. This more observational and descriptive phase will incorporate a wider range of background stressors, geographical districts, castes, ethnicities and traditional healer backgrounds.
Ultimately, once the study is completed, we will develop a comprehensive mechanisms of action model that can be used to create a blended curriculum offered to both traditional healers and mental healthcare providers. This study’s data will help establish more advanced referral pathways, thereby better streamlining care between both groups.
Learn more about this project team.
This project was funded by Duke Bass Connections. This post was originally published on the Bass Connections website.